hm....
well, what to say, I even don't know why I gave it 4 since it deserves more of a 3.
Fincher is a good and well respected director, that's for sure, but I don't think he needed this.
I'll try to be as brief as possible in this review, so here it goes: - horrible acting, and I do mean
hm....
well, what to say, I even don't know why I gave it 4 since it deserves more of a 3.
Fincher is a good and well respected director, that's for sure, but I don't think he needed this.
I'll try to be as brief as possible in this review, so here it goes: - horrible acting, and I do mean horrible - moronic excuse for dialogs - poor soundtrack - story without much sense and logic in it, or maybe better without it
I managed to fall asleep in the cinema, the movie looked like a bunch of scenes random scenes stitched together with a glue, filmed only to fill the runtime of the movie. The whole story could be fitted into 45 minutes if you ask me.
At the end, I really can't understand why did this movie got so much praises, is it just because it was made by Fincher?
advice: if you skip this movie, you won't make a mistake.
