Title & End Shots: Guidelines
Hey everyone,
The staff has realized that there are no clear guidelines for title shots. We have been thinking, and the following came out:
Title shots should preferably be presented in the original language (or english, if the the original language seems too hard to get).
For the Title Still: The first occurrence of the movie title in the movie. In some cases, this is only in the end credits, but this is also fine.
For "The End" Still, it is a bit more complicated, since there is a bit of variation in this per movie. The order of preference is as follows:
1) "The End"/"Fin"/"To Be Continued", etc. (from the end of the movie only)
2) 2nd occurrence of the title of the movie (if this is in the end credits, and the start title has a seperate shot)
3) "Directed by..." (from the end credits only)
4) "And they lived happily ever after" or any text of that kind (from the end of the movie only)
5) "In loving memory of..." or similar (from the end of the movie only)
6) Anything from closing credits, showing credits (cast, crew, ...)
Also, remember that this does NOT mean that you can't upload title shots as regular shots: if they are awesome and quiz-worthy, you are free to upload them via NS/awesome upload, and then assign the shot as soon as it hits the archive.
For title shots already in the system (and we mean shots uploaded as title shots, not shots assigned as title shots), the original uploader gets the chance to replace this shot, until sept. 1st, after which everybody can replace title shots that do not fit the guidelines. So please, do not tag any shot replaceplease, or replace them yourself, before this date.
Archive shots that don't match the criteria above and have been assigned as title shots will be unassigned.
If there are any questions, your friendly neighbourhood mods are always around :)
Have fun!
First of all I think it's good that there are some guidance about this...up till now I almost did it like this automaticly, but sometimes I also let my feelings judge about the end shot. (when it was not clear, I always thought what would look best as an end shot and then upload it).
What to do in such a case for example:
There is already the same shot uploaded in the FF with the same background as the Cast and Crew one would have:

Now since the movie has no end still, no 2nd title, no "directed by" etc. I would have to upload the cast and crew one with the same background like the shot above (mine is just in a better quality)

So if I upload this, there would be almost 2 identical shots in the archive...just 1 with the cast and one without, which was uploaded before already by another user.
So from my feeling I thought there shouldn't be almost two identical shots in the archive, so I uploaded this one instead:

It's also from the closing credits but with some other picture to make it more diverse.
Would this be allowed or would I have to replace it with the cast and crew one?
The shot you uploaded is OK by me, BUT the other one would have been OK too.
There will be shots similarities between some Archive shots and some End Title shots. But that's OK, as long as the End Title shot was not an Archive shot that has been assigned.
The whole purpose of this rule is to give a chance for more shots through NS/FF.
i dont get why 3) "Directed by..." is prefered by 4) "And they lived happily ever after" or any text of that kind..
i think 'they lived happily ever after' is more special and more like a 'The End' shot than just 'Directed by..'
I know I'm a bit off-topic, but I don't want to open a new thread for my question.
is there any rule or limitation about character shots? I noticed that sometimes several shots are uploaded for the same character, so I have 2 remarks about that.
First, I think this is quite useless to have 10 shots of the same character, IMO theses shots should only be uploaded to show what the character looks like, and we don't need to have a picture of every scene in which he/she appears.
Second, I think these shots should be as "boring" as possible. Sometimes these characters shots come from specific scenes and could be uploaded as regular shots. 2 examples I found recently:
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/142082
http://whatthemovie.com/shot/188186
What do you think??
Yeah, we need to think of some guidelines for those too.
So far, the only guidelines are:
- same rules as usual +
- only one character clearly visible on the shot
- face must be visible (for "uploaded as character shot" shots)
We'll discuss this in an upcoming Staff meeting.
BTW, I deleted the 2nd shot, the character's face couldn't be seen.
Plus we'll discuss the suggestion made by both toffetomas and fungus on the title shot guidelines.
Personally I do not agree with a limitation of shots per character, for several reasons:
1) The Message on the starting page of WTM says: "We don´t try to bring you all the features of Rotten Tomatoes or the IMDb. You won´t see fancy actor pages, movie trivia or the latest news. Instead, we focus on the Movies and their Characters themselves."
If you focus on the characters themselves and advertise with it on the starting page, then the idea from my understanding should be to bring some kind of variety of shots and different scenes from all the characters, not just 1 or 2 boring shots in the character section and that's it.
2) If we are honest there are still way too few users who regularly upload in the character section. So why put a limitation to these users...
3) In my opinion there are already way too many simple character shots in the NS right now. Don't get me wrong, I also upload a character shot sometimes when I feel it is worth uploading, but very often such shots are just boring to see in the NS. From my personal taste shots like this have nothing lost in the FF section: http://whatthemovie.com/shot/189522 (No offense against the uploader of course, especially that he is still new and it was probably right to accept one of his shots to give him some motivation to continue uploading). But a limitation to the character section could only lead to an increase of uploaded character shots in the NS...and that's something I wouldn't like to see.
4) What if a character is liked very much by the community and let's say 10 people would want to upload their character shots for this certain character. If there is a limitation to only a few shots not everyone could do it.
5) If you say it is "useless to have 10 shots of the same character" and several different scenes they appear in, why would you want to see them be uploaded in the NS section? At the end it would be the same if the shots make it to the archive...just that in the character section they are all together and you get something like an overview for these characters there.
So if there is really a need for a limitation of character shots (at the moment I don't really see why) it should be something like at least 5 shots per character per user. This would be something like a compromise which everyone could live with probably.
But actually as long as the shots aren't completely dupes I wouldn't have a problem if there is no limitation at all and everyone should be able to upload what he wants into the character section as long as he stick to the rules of course.
To toffetomas & fungus point I agree, even this would mean that some new uploaded "directed by"-shots would have to be replaced again.
Reminder: List with the top 100 movies without title shots http://whatthemovie.com/page/titles
Hello.
I messed up with "Dnevnoy dozor"
I uploaded "Title Still"

Then i wanted to upload end "The End Still" and saw this: http://whatthemovie.com/shot/75905
Yes. I know. I Fucked Up.
Please delete my "Title Still" and reassign Pinokio1983 shot from "The End Still" to "Title Still", then I upload "The End Still".
Thanks and sorry for trouble.