(spoilers ahead)

„Triangle” is not a great movie, but it definitely had the potential to be one. The script is actually quite good, it forces the viewer to pay close attention to the events, it surprises and it is engaging. The movie has many flaws, but the effort the creators made needs to be appreciated, it was quiite some time since I've seen such confusing and original thriller.

The main heroine is Jess, strange waitress who has an autistic child. She goes on a boat trip with the guy who's hitting on her and his friends. She is very weird and has good reason for it – but at the beginning the audience is kept in the dark. Suddenly, when they are on open sea strange and sudden storm causes the boat to trip over and the passengers of „Triangle” are left alone, with no help coming. But then strange ship appears and they get on board.

Since that moment movie turns into thriller with many clues, turns and twists. There are quite clever red herrings planted all over the film – one of the people on the boat, Heather, presumably died, but then when strange things start happening on the ship, the audience and the characters suspect it is her doing them. Then I suspected the ship is hunted and ghosts are trying to kill the rescued ones. Then I thought maybe it's like “The Strangers” and some demented sailors are playing sick games. I was wrong. And I love being wrong when I'm watching the movie.

We all know the story of Sisyphus. The man who cheated Death and was terribly punished – he was made to roll a huge rock up a hill, but before reaching the top of the hill the rock would roll back down, forcing him to begin again, for eternity in Tartarus.

The remark about this is made pretty early in „Triangle”, as well as the name of the ghostly sheep - „Aeolus” - the ruler of winds in Greek mythology. After some time, we realize that Jess is caught in the loop, but I made the connection to Sisyphus very late, only by the end of the movie. Jess is forced to relive the situation on the boat and the ship, over and over again, presumably trying to save her son, who is killed in car accident, caused by her. We only see 3 loops and for me that's the biggest flaw and for others, I'm sure, it maybe the biggest asset of the story. There is simply too much left for interpretation – there are clues, but not enough to make sense of entire film.

We see bodies of seagulls, bodies of Sally, which suggest that events happened many times. But why did Jess get to the car in the first place? Why does she gets on Aeolus? Why does she go to the marine? There are answers, but they are either flawed or completely made up by the viewer. It seems Jess forgets she is dead and in the loop whenever she sleeps. Then why does she go to sleep in the first place? As for boarding both „Triangle” and „Aeolus” she tries to rescue her son. But still had she not slept, had she finally stayed home with him instead of driving to the marina...The only solution I see lies in the character of the taxi driver, who seems to be some kind of Ferryman – she doesn't go back to the cab and cheats him, just like Sisyphus cheated Death in the myth. Therefore she is punished. Is the Ferryman there each time? Is he only at the scene of the accident or can he magically appear everywhere? As I said there are too many things open for interpretation, which is frustrating because you cannot have the full picture if somebody gives you too few of the puzzles. I love confusing movies, ones that leave you thinking and reading about them, ones that force you to filter all this filth on imdb.com in order to find the solution, ones which have so much in them, each time you watch them you find something new. And with „Mulholland drive” for example there is no ultimate explanation, but the director gave us enough to make sense of the whole thing and came up with full picture – maybe not the right one, but complete. This is not the case with „Triangle”.

I read people interpret this movie in many ways – I agree with the loop theory. Other ones include the idea that Jess is crazy and kills everyone and then has delusions. I'm sure that's a reasonable guess given that movie pays tribute to „The Shining” many times – messages on the mirror, ballroom and number 237.

There are many people who I'm sure don't want to spend days making sense out of films. If that is the case, watching Triangle may be a little boring. The movie has many suspenseful scenes and works as a thriller, but I think the most attractive side of the story is trying to understand it. However the atmosphere is quite spooky and the movie is very well done – the storm scene is great and the cinematography is fantastic and gives rather unique feel to the film.

The only problem, apart from too many things left unsaid in the film, was with foolishness of certain parts. I spent a lot of time on the boats when I was younger – I know how to tie knots, I know how to steer a boat, I know basic safety measures before sailing on the open sea. So when I see the movie where a group of people swims out, pretty damn far, on the sailboat which doesn't even have a outboard motor just in case wind dies (as it did) I'm stunned. Even when I was 9 years old I always dreaded the possibility of this happening and I always refused to go on the boat without such device. It is something most audience won't pay attention to, I'm sure, but it already planted the idea of „what a silly movie” in my head. Sure, it was a supernatural loop, but after all the boat was real. Another time I was shocked by the stupidity was then the heroine is running away from someone and that someone hits her with a huge shotgun which falls next to her, yet she doesn't grab it. And in both cases it contradicts itself within minutes – the boat doesn't have other means of moving around except for sails, but it has a radio. Heroine doesn't grab the shotgun yet she grabs an axe. I was confused. And the other people in the movie except for Jess are rather stereotypical horror characters, being dumb, getting killed and uttering awful dialogue.

I love it when the main heroine is fragile looking, petrified blonde carrying around something deadly. It works – look at Naomi Watts in „The Ring”, Nicole Kidman in „The Others”, Kate Hudson in „Skeleton Key” and here Melissa George. I like her, although she is not much of an actress. But she has pretty good experience with that particular genre - „Amityville horror”, „30 days of night” and now this. I saw few of her films and this is definitely her best performance. She is credible and she is perfectly cast. Her character is very interesting, conflicted, she gets to portray many different emotions throughout the film. After seeing her in something as bad as „Grey's Anatomy” (with all due respect to fans of the show, but playing indie music during operations and having every character sleep with other characters can be pushed to such extremes even I cannot take it) I was quite impressed with her work here.

The movie could have been great, but it is still a good thriller. If you find the action boring you can focus on the plot, if trying to figure out the plot will bore you, you can always get a little scared. Very interesting idea for the movie, but wasted one.